A Generational Shift: Race and the Declining Lifetime Risk of Imprisonment.

Mass incarceration fundamentally altered the life course for a generation of American men, but sustained declines in imprisonment in recent years raise questions about how incarceration is shaping current generations. This study makes three primary contributions to a fuller understanding of the contemporary landscape of incarceration in the United States. First, we assess the scope of decarceration. Between 1999 and 2019, the Black male incarceration rate dropped by 44%, and notable declines in Black male imprisonment were evident in all 50 states. Second, our life table analysis demonstrates marked declines in the lifetime risks of incarceration. For Black men, the lifetime risk of incarceration declined by nearly half from 1999 to 2019. We estimate that less than 1 in 5 Black men born in 2001 will be imprisoned, compared with 1 in 3 for the 1981 birth cohort. Third, decarceration has shifted the institutional experiences of young adulthood. In 2009, young Black men were much more likely to experience imprisonment than college graduation. Ten years later, this trend had reversed, with Black men more likely to graduate college than go to prison. Our results suggest that prison has played a smaller role in the institutional landscape for the most recent generation compared with the generation exposed to the peak of mass incarceration.

Pregnancy in incarcerated women: need for national legislation to standardize care.

OBJECTIVES: This review examined prenatal care provided to incarcerated women to identify areas where improvement is needed, and examined current legislative gaps such that they can be addressed to ensure uniform templates of care be instituted at women's prisons. METHODS: Data were compiled from 2000-2021 citations in PubMed and Google Scholar using the keywords: prison AND prenatal care AND pregnancy. RESULTS: Although the right to health care of inmates is protected under the Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution, the literature suggests that prenatal care of incarcerated individuals is variable and would benefit from uniform federal standards. Inconsistency in reporting requirements has created a scarcity of data for this population, making standardization of care difficult. Although incarceration may result in improved access to care that women may not have had in their community, issues of shackling, inadequate prenatal diet, lack of access to comprehensive mental health management, and poor availability of opioid use disorder (OUD) management such as Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) amd Opioid Treatment Programs (OTP), history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are just a few areas that must be focused on in prenatal care. After birth, mother-baby units (MBU) to enhance maternal-fetal bonding also should be a prison standard. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to implementing templates of care specifically directed to this subgroup of women, standardized state and federal legislation are recommended to ensure that uniform standards of prenatal care are enforced and also to encourage the reporting of data regarding pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in correctional facilities.

Ending Restraint of Incarcerated Individuals Giving Birth.

Advocates have long suggested making shackling incarcerated people during childbirth illegal. Yet exceptions would likely still allow prison personnel to implement restraint and leave clinicians no course for freeing a patient. This article argues that clinicians' assessments of laboring individuals' clinical needs must be prioritized, ethically and legally. This article also explains that, without strong policies in place, some clinicians will not feel empowered to demand that a patient be freed during labor. Beyond prohibiting restraint of laboring individuals, health care organizations must support clinicians seeking to execute their ethical duties to care well and justly for patients. Toward this end, this article proposes a model policy.

Hunger strike in prison: medical, ethical and legal aspects.

BACKGROUND: A hunger strike is a common form of protest in prison and is a potential cause of many types of problems, both for facility administrators and health care staff. Issues of conflict of rights and obligations involved, and how to treat people who are subject, have created major controversies. OBJECTIVES: To identify and review published studies that discuss the medical, ethical and legal considerations of managing a hunger strike in a prison setting from a physician's perspective. METHODS: A database search using "Medline" "Ovid" and "Science Direct was conducted to identify relevant publications. We included case series, guidelines and, review articles. RESULTS: The physician must clearly inform the striker of the risks and provide clinical assessment and regular monitoring of the concerned. The role of the psychiatrist is to detect an initial mental pathology underlying or secondary to fasting and assess the capacity of the striker's judgment. Thus, the clinician is faced with two paradoxical obligations: to assist and respect the striker's will. In addition, medical intervention is possible if the prognosis is life-threatening even without the patient's consent. CONCLUSION: The current practice of non-consensual attitude among hunger-striking seeking in detention needs a closer inquiry. Medical practitioners should be aware of their ethical and legal responsibilities, and that they should act independently of government or institutional interests.

Seizing the Moment: Policy Advocacy to End Mass Incarceration in the Time of COVID-19.

The mass human and economic casualties wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic laid bare the deep inequities at the base of the disproportionate losses and suffering experienced by diverse U.S. populations. But the urgency and enormity of unmet needs requiring bold policy action also provided a unique opportunity to learn from and partner with community-based organizations that often are at the frontlines of such work. Following a review of Kingdon's model of the policy-making process, we illustrate how a partnership in a large California county navigated the streams in the policy-making process and used the window of opportunity provided by the pandemic to address a major public health problem: the incarceration of over 2 million people, disproportionately African American and Latinx, in overcrowded, unsafe jails, prisons, and detention centers. We highlight tactics and strategies used, challenges faced, and implications for health educators as policy advocates during and beyond the pandemic.

Social Distancing and Incarceration: Policy and Management Strategies to Reduce COVID-19 Transmission and Promote Health Equity Through Decarceration.

Incarcerated people are at disproportionately high risk of contracting COVID-19. Prisons are epicenters for COVID-19 transmission, including to the community. High rates of preexisting health conditions, limited access to quality health care, and inability to social distance make it impossible to reduce the impact of COVID-19 in prisons. Due to a history of compounded social determinants, incarcerated populations are disproportionately composed of people of color and people with stigmatized behavioral health disorders. Rapid decarceration is needed to promote health equity. Historical mass decarceration events demonstrate feasibility to rapidly release large groups of people while maintaining public safety. Iran and Ireland have released substantial portions of their prison populations by transitioning people to home confinement. In the United States and Uganda, some jurisdictions have reduced new incarcerations through policies that decrease arrests. These policies must be globally expanded to contain the epidemic, and its potential health consequences, while addressing health equity.

Intellectual disabilities in Irish prisons: Could Article 13 of the UNCRPD hold the key?

The prevalence of intellectual disabilities amongst adult prisoners in Ireland is higher than international estimates. There is little evidence that the development of diversion services has impacted such prevalence. The authors argue that Ireland's ratification of the UNCRPD presents a timely opportunity to address this problem through an awareness programme aimed at frontline law enforcement officials.

Using laws to further public health causes: the Healthy Prisons Agenda.

In this commentary, we propose using laws in implementing the Healthy Prisons Agenda. We evaluate the efficacy of laws in tackling health inequalities in prisons, provide recommendations on how states can uphold their international commitments that safeguard prisoners' right to healthcare, and frame prisons as health-promoting settings. We also assess the challenges that can thwart this proposal, such as the non-binding nature of international obligations, global prison overcrowding and the dependency on prison governors and staff for implementation of the Agenda. The commentary concludes by recommending further evaluation of our proposal and testing its potential generalisability to other health-promotion agendas.

Contagio y medidas de prevención de SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) en prisiones / Transmission and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in prisons

No disponible

El nuevo modelo asistencial de la enfermería penitenciaria / The new healthcare model in prison nursing

No disponible

Aproximación al tratamiento de la ludopatía en el sistema penal español / Approach to pathological gambling treatment inSpanish criminal law

El incremento de las casas de apuestas supone un aumento de la oportunidad para iniciarse en los juegos de azar, pero también para el desarrollo de patologías como la ludopatía. Lo mismo podría decirse respecto de la expansión del juego online, especialmente en sectores jóvenes de la población, atendiendo además a las facilidades que la tecnología ofrece respecto de las adicciones comportamentales. Este contexto supone un factor criminógeno que favorece la comisión de hechos delictivos relacionados con el juego patológico, con el objetivo de satisfacer las necesidades económicas de la persona para seguir jugando. De acuerdo con lo expuesto, en este trabajo se analiza el tratamiento penal de la ludopatía, considerando su afectación a la capacidad volitiva del sujeto, mediante la aplicación de la atenuante de análoga significación recogida en el art. 21.7 del Código penal. La descripción del marco legal sobre la imputabilidad y la atenuación de la pena en los casos de ludopatía es acompañada por un estudio de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo en lo relativo al tratamiento del juego patológico

The increasing number of betting offices entails an increase in opportunities to start gambling, but also concerning the development of pathologies such as compulsive gambling. The situation is the same with respect to the expansion of online gambling, specially focused on young people, according to the new context created by the incidence of technologies regarding behavioral addictions. This context entails a criminogenic risk which could lead to the committing of offences related to pathological gambling, with the purpose of feeding the gambling habit. In line with this issue, this paper analyses the treatment of compulsive gambling in Spanish criminal law, taking into account its effect on a person’s willpower, by means of the analogical mitigating circumstance regulated in art. 21.7 Criminal Code. The description of the legal framework regarding accountability and mitigation of the penalty in compulsive gambling is combined with a study about the Supreme Court case law related to pathological gambling treatment

The 6/24 rule: A review and proposal for an international standard of a minimum of six hours of continuous sleep in detention settings.

Editorial.